|
| |
Alan Gordon Fine
Arts & Illustration
|
|
|
|
"Admittedly, art making probably does require something special, but just
what that something might be has
remained
remarkably
elusive - elusive enough to suggest that it may be something
particular to each artist,
rather than universal to them all."
-
David Bayles & Ted Orland (excerpt from Art & Fear)
|
|
The it
of art |
|
This philosophy/opinion is a combination of many theories that I
have come across through the years.
Anyone interested
in books and names should feel free to contact me, and I will provide
the titles. There is more writing on the world of art in my
journals.
I have had many people tell me that they don't really have art in their
lives. They don't go to galleries, so they don't see art, and they
wouldn't know how to appreciate it anyway. I'm an artist, and
even I can't find a whole lot of time to go to galleries to see it.
They don't have any paintings in their homes, so they never see it.
Who knows where it is, maybe I'm missing it. If
I missed it, how would I know? They go on to say that they
are studying (or wish they could study) art in order to be educated about
it- because they don't get it.
They
all want to know what the deal is with the orange NYC Central Park
curtains, or the guy who shot himself, or the crucifix in the jar of
urine. It makes them angry. In other words: I don't
know much about art, but I know what I like. Most of the time, many
people do not realize how much art is around them each day, so I thought
I'd look around my surroundings to see what I found. But first...
What is it ? I have heard that everything can be art.
If that is the case, then what isn't art? It seems as if anyone
can be an artist, no matter what they do- or what they produce. What makes
it art? I can only give my opinion on it.
The
difference between a work of art, and a hobby or craft is the
connection
of artist and viewer, and a standard. A viewer must have some base
knowledge (or standard) to work with (the previously mentioned adage of:
I don't know much about art, but I know what I like...is just plain
lazy). Would you go out and buy a car without doing any
research? What about buying the first car you see? Are they
all good simply because they are called "cars"? Once you have sought
out a base understanding of art principles (what the universal & general
rules are for appreciation), then you have to go out and look at art, a
lot of art. What strikes you as "art"? What do they have in
common?
Every profession has a way of judging quality, and art is not an
exception. Here are 3 good measurements once you have a base
understanding (From author Ted Orland).
#1: Art should
glorify a life-based or spiritual belief.
#2: Art should
educate/enlighten our neighbors.
#3: Art must continue to
expand our technical and cognitive abilities.
It
has been argued for many years that art should not have to be held to the
standards of the "Masters" (as in realism from the past-usually the 1600's
through the 1800's), and I agree. But art has lost its way.
The connection to a viewer is no longer vital in modern art. That changed
with the phrase "Art for art's sake." Coined by the artist James Whistler
in the early 20th century. This ushered in "modern art". The
Modernist movement in art created a new way of thinking (referred to
as a "paradigm shift"), but soon after- art didn't seem to think anymore.
Increasingly, artists gravitated towards controversy, choosing shock
over substance and depth that reached large groups. As the saying
goes: the boundary pushers were just preaching to the choir. But,
art continued on (as it always will because individual self-expression is
vital to our survival). But in reality it is that connection of
artist and viewer that gives art its power in society.
Art
is powerful, and it
is all around us.
Many
people cringe when I say that there is "good" art and there is "bad" art.
But there is good and bad in every field, there has to be. You
cannot establish good, without having some scale that identifies bad.
The
appreciation of art is based on generalized mechanics that provide for
effective visual (and conceptual) analysis, add some appreciation for
the overlooked elements, and maybe you have it. Even with
Modernist concepts- Form is still the material used to
create, and Content (or the message)-still matters. Yes,
there are exceptions, but every time the rules are broken does not mean
you have quality- or even art.
Adhering to principles
that created great work some 2- 400 years ago is discriminatory towards
the advancement of a civilization. But outright abandonment of sound
principles simply for the sake of change leaves a cognitive vacuum.
A balance of history and progression has the possibility to re-establish
art as a powerful force in society. Change is necessary for us as a
people. Are we supposed to just sit and listen to the same music
over and over again? Should we continue with the same wars, the same
marketing, the same trivial disputes, the same tractor-pulls, the same
depressions, the same poverty, the same addictions? When is the same
way not the only way? How do we go forward if we are always looking
back?
Susan Sontag
said: The only real answers are those that DESTROY the
questions.
|
|
The mainstays of
it are painting, photography, sculpture, printing, architecture,
design, drawing, and other main artistic formats...But it also is
influenced by: The appreciation of architecture, wood, stone, pattern,
culture, shape, texture, and color.
It
appreciates light and shadow, nature, decorations, and skilled crafts-and
it enhances packaging, popular culture, products, and other fun
stuff... |
|
(click on the
thumbnail to enlarge)
            
              
             
             
|
|
So, where do these
appreciations transfer into or out of art? Here is a start toward
discovering the "good" in art... |
|
            
           
            
           
         
          
|
|
Ashley Wood, Artemisia Gentileschi, Stuart Davis, Marcel Duchamp (R.
Mutt), Gianlorenzo Bernini, Andy Goldsworthy, Jim Dine, Frank Lloyd
Wright, Marisol, Jan Vermeer,
Andy Warhol, Ansel Adams, Gustav Klimt, Bill Sienkiewicz, Albert Paley,
Caravaggio, Kent Williams,Wendell Castle, Odd Nerdrum, Henry Moore,
Thomas Cole, Dale Chihuly,
Eliot Porter, Franz Marc, Maxfield Parrish, Pablo Picasso, Jan Van Eych,
Claude Monet, Chris Burden, David Hockney, Mark Rothko, Bernie Fuchs,
Jack Kirby, Andrew Wyeth,
Albert Bierstadt, Dave McKean, Jean Leon-Gerome, Jerome Witkin, Marshall
Arisman, Phil Hale, Norman Rockwell, John Singer Sargent, Jenny Holzer,
Sir Lawrence Alma-Tedema, Winslow Homer, William-Adolph Bouguereau,
Louise Nevelson, Sandy Skoglund, Leonard DaVinci, Larry Rivers, Anselm
Keifer, Alex Ross, Ron English, Jasper Johns,
Edward Hopper, Robert Mapplethorpe, Claus Oldenburg, Annie Leibowitz,
Joe Coleman, Frank Gehry, Greg & Tim Hildebrandt, Howard Pyle, Leo &
Dianne Dillon, Robert Longo, Audrey Flack, NC Wyeth, Paul Rand, Joseph
Turner, Saul Bass, Judy Chicago, Art Spiegelman.
_______________________________________________________________
View
former student artwork
(RIT/MCC/GCC/Nazareth) |
|
|
|